Skip to main content
Back

Marketing teams do not collaborate in one tool.

Chat happens in Slack, briefs live in Notion, design review happens in Figma, video review happens in Frame.io, and social approvals happen in a social tool. Squeeze all of that into a single platform and at least three of those jobs get done badly. So the useful question is which stack to build, and which tool earns each slot in it.

This guide sorts thirteen tools by slot: chat, project management, docs, whiteboarding, design, creative proofing, and social content. Prices and plan limits were checked against vendor pages in August 2026.

The Short Answer

Think of marketing collaboration as a stack with slots. Maeve Social owns the social-execution slot: client workspaces, review links for external sign-off without a seat or account, approval workflows, analytics across seven supported networks, and white-labeled PDF reports, at flat pricing from $25 a month. It is the layer that turns approved creative into scheduled, published, and reported social content.

For the rest of the stack:

Chat: Slack, or Microsoft Teams if you already pay for Microsoft 365. One of them, never both.
Campaigns and tasks: Asana, monday.com, or ClickUp, whichever your team will actually open.
Docs and whiteboards: Notion for the knowledge base, Miro or FigJam for workshops.
Design: Figma, the de facto standard. View-and-comment access is free on paid plans; $3 Collab seats add full FigJam, Figma Slides, and Figma Buzz access.
Creative proofing: Filestage for mixed assets, Frame.io for video, Planable for social-post review specifically.

Maeve Social

The social slot in the stack: draft, approve through no-login review links, schedule, and report from one workspace, at flat prices from $25.

See Maeve Approvals

Plan, preview, and publish in one workflow

Six Things to Check Before You Commit

These criteria separate the tools that survive past ninety days from the ones your team quietly abandons. Match real-time versus async to your team's actual rhythm, which may differ from the rhythm you wish you had. Check whether a client can comment without buying a seat, since most PM tools force guest workarounds where Maeve's review links, Planable, Frame.io, and Filestage handle it natively. Look for real approval mechanics rather than an @-mention and a prayer.

Then the practical three: file type coverage, since video review needs different machinery than design review; integrations, because whatever you pick has to talk to the rest of the stack; and cost as you scale, since per-user pricing compounds hard past ten people, which is where flat-priced and unlimited-user tools earn their place.

The 13 Tools at a Glance

Vendor-listed prices as of August 2026, annual billing where noted.

ToolSlotStarting PriceFree Plan
Maeve SocialSocial execution and approvals$25/mo flat3-day trial
SlackReal-time chat$7.25/user/mo annualYes, 90-day history
Microsoft TeamsChat and video, Microsoft shops$4/user/moLimited
NotionDocs and knowledge base$10/user/moYes
MiroWhiteboarding and workshops$8/member/mo annualYes, 3 boards
FigmaDesign collaboration$3/collab seat/moYes
AsanaCross-functional campaigns$10.99/user/mo annualYes, 2 users
monday.comVisual campaign boards$9/seat/mo annual, min 3Yes, 2 seats
ClickUpAll-in-one tasks and docs$7/user/mo annualYes
WrikeAgency PM and client portals$10/user/moYes, unlimited users
PlanableVisual social review$39/workspace/moYes, 50 posts
FilestageCreative proofing$199/mo annualYes, 1 active project
Frame.ioVideo review$15/user/moYes, 2 seats
One slot per tool.

1. Maeve Social, the Social Content Slot

Maeve Social covers the layer where copywriters, designers, brand managers, and clients all need to look at the same post before it goes live. Content gets drafted, reviewed, approved, scheduled, and then reported on, all in one place, while campaign briefs stay in whatever PM tool your team already runs.

The collaboration mechanics: approval workflows and internal review from Standard, client review links so external stakeholders sign off without a seat, an account, or a view into anything else, a social inbox covering Instagram, Facebook, Threads, TikTok, YouTube, and Google Business Profile with assignments and internal notes, an AI assistant on monthly credits, analytics with best-time suggestions on every plan, and white-labeled PDF reports for the client deliverable. Pricing is flat, 1 user on Basic, 5 on Standard, unlimited on Premium, so a growing team does not grow the bill.

The honest limits: approvals start on Standard at $99 rather than the entry plan, and it is built for social posts rather than video edits or print proofs, so dedicated proofing tools like Filestage and Frame.io go deeper on creative review.

PlanMonthlySocial ConnectionsWorkspacesUsers
Basic$25/mo2021
Standard$99/mo5055
Premium$199/moUnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimited
Flat pricing; growth inside the caps changes nothing on the bill.
Pricing: Basic $25/mo, Standard $99, Premium $199, flat, with a 3-day trial and yearly billing about 20% cheaper.
Slot: Social content collaboration, approvals, scheduling to 9 platforms, and reporting.
Best for: Teams and agencies collaborating on social content with internal and client sign-off.
The verdict: The social slot, filled at a flat rate. Keep the PM tool for briefs and the proofing tool for video.

2. Slack, the Real-Time Chat Slot

Slack is the default chat tool for teams not already living in Microsoft. Channels organize work by campaign or function, the integration library is the biggest in the category, nearly every PM, design, social, and analytics tool ships a Slack app, and Slack Connect makes client and partner channels easy to run.

The costs: $7.25 per user a month on annual billing adds up, the free plan's 90-day history cap forces the upgrade for any serious team, and notification overload is a real tax most teams under-manage.

Pricing: Free with 90-day history, Pro $7.25 per user a month annual, Business+ $15.
Best for: Marketing teams that live in chat and need integrations with everything.
The verdict: The default answer to where the team talks, outside Microsoft shops.

3. Microsoft Teams, Chat and Video for Microsoft Shops

Teams ships with Microsoft 365, so companies already paying for Microsoft's business suite often have the collaboration layer covered. Teams Essentials is $4 per user a month paid yearly, while Microsoft 365 Business Basic is $7 and adds business email, web and mobile apps, and 1 TB of storage per user.

The trade-offs: chat ergonomics trail Slack by common consent, the integration ecosystem is thinner outside Microsoft's own tools, and the Copilot AI add-on costs a separate $21 per user.

Pricing: Teams Essentials $4 per user a month paid yearly; Microsoft 365 Business Basic $7; Business Standard with Copilot $23.50.
Best for: Marketing teams already on Microsoft 365.
The verdict: If Microsoft already bills you, use it. If not, Slack chats better.

4. Notion, the Docs and Knowledge Slot

Notion is a flexible workspace more than a strict PM tool. For marketing teams it becomes the knowledge base, brand guidelines hub, content library, and campaign brief home all at once, and the database system means the same content can appear as a calendar, board, table, or gallery without being duplicated. Non-technical marketers onboard quickly.

The limits: Notion now supports subtasks, dependencies, and timeline views, but its project controls remain lighter than purpose-built PM tools. Business costs $20 per member monthly on annual billing, and a blank workspace needs deliberate templates and governance.

Pricing: Free plan, Plus $10 per user a month, Business $20.
Best for: Teams that collaborate in long-form docs and need a shared knowledge base.
The verdict: Owns the knowledge-base slot nothing else here fills. Not your PM tool.

5. Miro, the Whiteboard Slot

Miro is the whiteboard for teams that cannot all stand in the same room: sticky notes, frameworks, voting, timers, and breakout facilitation replace everything the physical whiteboard used to do, with thousands of templates for recurring sessions. For distributed teams that is not a nice-to-have.

The caveats: the Business tier jumps to $20 per member, enterprise carries a hard member minimum, and very large boards can slow down.

Pricing: Free with 3 boards, Starter $8 per member a month annual, Business $20.
Best for: Distributed teams running strategy workshops, brainstorms, and planning sessions.
The verdict: The best workshop experience remote teams can buy. FigJam covers lighter needs if you already pay for Figma.

6. Figma, the Design Slot

Figma is where many modern marketing teams collaborate on design. Real-time multi-user editing puts copywriters, designers, and brand managers in the same file, while comments replace the email loop of PNG attachments. Paid plans allow free view-and-comment access; the $3 Collab seat is for people who also need full FigJam, Figma Slides, and Figma Buzz access.

The costs: full seats run $16 a month on Professional and far more on the organization tiers, and non-designers face a genuine learning curve even as commenters.

Pricing: Free Starter plan; Professional $16 monthly per full seat, $12 per Dev seat, and $3 per Collab seat. View-and-comment access does not require a paid seat.
Best for: Marketing teams collaborating with designers on creative work.
The verdict: The design standard. Put reviewers on collab seats and the bill stays sane.

7. Asana, the Campaign Coordination Slot

Asana is the most-used PM tool in marketing because the collaboration features genuinely work: comments, mentions, attachments, and status updates live on the task itself, so cross-functional campaigns stop drowning in chat threads. Timeline views, forms, and templates handle repeatable briefs, and approvals and proofing arrive on the Advanced tier.

The costs: per-user pricing climbs fast, ten users on Advanced run about $250 a month, there is no native chat, and time tracking requires Advanced.

Pricing: Free for 2 users, Starter $10.99 per user a month annual, Advanced $24.99.
Best for: Marketing teams coordinating copy, design, web, and paid inside one campaign.
The verdict: The strongest collaboration UX among general PM tools, at per-seat prices that reward counting.

8. monday.com, the Visual Boards Slot

monday.com leans hard into the visual: colorful status columns, multiple board views, drag-and-drop everywhere. Teams that picture their work as a pipeline moving from idea to review to published tend to prefer it over Asana's list-first approach, and guest access on Standard covers client involvement without per-seat fees for clients.

The trade-offs: a 3-seat minimum on paid plans, time tracking and private boards on the $19 Pro tier, and monthly billing that runs well above the annual rates.

Pricing: Free for 2 seats, Basic $9 per seat a month annual, Standard $12, Pro $19, minimum 3 seats.
Best for: Teams that think in boards and pipelines rather than lists.
The verdict: The nicest boards in the category. Model the seat math before committing.

9. ClickUp, the All-in-One Attempt

ClickUp folds task management, docs, whiteboards, chat, goals, and dashboards into a single platform at the lowest mid-tier price in PM: $7 per user for Unlimited, $12 for Business with dashboards and serious automation quotas. For teams that hate tool sprawl it can genuinely replace three or four products.

The cost you pay instead is the steepest learning curve in the category, an interface density that overwhelms non-technical teammates, a separate charge for the AI, and a chat feature that trails Slack by a distance.

Pricing: Free plan, Unlimited $7 per user a month annual, Business $12, AI as a paid add-on.
Best for: Teams under about fifteen people that want tasks, docs, and dashboards in one product.
The verdict: The closest thing to one-tool-for-everything, which is precisely its limitation.

10. Wrike, the Agency PM Slot

Wrike is built for service businesses: request forms for client intake, client portals, proofing, time tracking, and resource planning are core features rather than bolt-ons. The free plan allows unlimited users, rare in PM, and the $10 Team tier serves small agencies up to its 15-user cap.

The trade-offs: the key agency features live on the $25 Business tier, there is no native invoicing, and the interface feels dated next to Asana and monday.

Pricing: Free with unlimited users, Team $10 per user a month, Business $25.
Best for: Marketing agencies collaborating with clients through portals and intake forms.
The verdict: The agency-shaped generalist. Pair it with a billing tool.

11. Planable, the Visual Social Review Slot

Planable's whole product is content collaboration, and the differentiator is the preview: posts render exactly as they will look on each platform, with comments and approvals layered alongside, so formatting problems surface mid-review instead of after publishing. Approvals scale from optional to multi-level, and every plan includes unlimited collaborators.

The constraints: per-workspace pricing that stacks across clients, post caps of 60 and 150 a month, and analytics at $14 a month and the inbox at $9 as add-ons. Its AI writing assistance is useful but is not the center of the product.

Pricing: Free for 50 posts total, Basic $39 per workspace a month, Pro $59.
Best for: Reviews where seeing the post exactly as it will appear matters most.
The verdict: The preview specialist for the social slot; compare it with Maeve Standard for that job.

12. Filestage, the Creative Proofing Slot

Filestage exists for asset-by-asset approval: designs, videos, audio, PDFs, and web pages, annotated directly on the file, with automatic versioning, side-by-side version comparison, and structured approval rounds replacing the email thread with seventeen attachments. Branded review links keep the client experience clean.

The trade-offs: Starter costs $199 a month billed yearly and includes 10 team members, so small teams pay for headroom they may not use. There is no social scheduling or publishing side.

Pricing: Free for 1 active project and 5 new files a month. Starter is $199 a month billed yearly, with 10 team members and unlimited active projects; 14-day trial.
Best for: Teams approving design, video, audio, and document assets with multiple reviewers.
The verdict: The broadest proofing coverage here. Sized and priced for teams, not solos.

13. Frame.io, the Video Review Slot

Frame.io is the standard for teams making serious video: time-coded comments directly on the footage, version stacking, camera-to-cloud upload, and native Adobe integration now that Adobe owns it. Editors and reviewers work from the same source instead of trading download links.

The limits: it is optimized for video workflows, storage grows with paid members, and teams outside Adobe-centered production may not use its deeper integrations.

Pricing: Free for 2 seats, Pro $15 per user a month, Team $25.
Best for: Teams producing video with multi-stakeholder review.
The verdict: The video-review standard. No value at all for teams that do not produce video.

Putting the Stack Together

There is no single best marketing collaboration tool, only a best stack for your team. The shape that holds up: one chat tool, one PM tool your team will actually open, Notion for docs, Miro or FigJam for whiteboards, Figma for design, a proofing tool matched to whether you ship more design or more video, and a social tool for the execution and approval layer. Pick one tool per slot, connect them through integrations, and accept a little overlap.

By team: in-house teams of 5 to 25 need the four pillars, chat, PM, design, and proofing. Agencies add client-facing review, which is where no-login links earn their place. Distributed teams cannot skip whiteboarding and async docs. And solo marketers need three tools at most; the six-tool stack is for teams that genuinely have six kinds of collaboration happening.

How We Put This List Together

Tools are sorted by the collaboration job they do best and judged on that slot rather than on whether they can replace an entire stack. Prices and plan limits were checked against vendor pages in August 2026.

Maeve Social is our product. It holds the social slot, drafting, approvals, scheduling, and reporting, and it does not do video proofing, design files, or team chat, which is exactly why this is a stack guide. The one-tool-per-slot recommendation stands even where the slot is not ours.

Frequently Asked Questions

The questions teams ask most when building the stack.

Can one tool replace the whole stack? No single tool is best at chat, project management, design, proofing, and social publishing. ClickUp covers several of those jobs, while specialized stacks trade more subscriptions for deeper workflows.
Do I really need multiple tools? Use multiple tools when your team genuinely has different collaboration jobs. Real-time chat and time-coded video approval are not the same workflow. Smaller teams can usually keep the stack to a PM tool, chat, and the execution tools tied to their output.
Slack or Microsoft Teams? If you are on Microsoft 365 already, Teams is included and the bundling is hard to beat. If not, Slack has the deeper integrations and better chat. Ignoring your existing stack usually ends in paying for both.
Which tools have real approval workflows? Maeve Social from Standard, Planable, Filestage, Frame.io, and Asana Advanced all provide structured review or approval workflows. Chat comments and document mentions can work for simple reviews, but they do not provide the same approval state and audit trail.
How do agencies handle client collaboration? Per-client workspaces keep data cleanly separated: Maeve Social with 5 on Standard and unlimited on Premium, Planable per workspace, Frame.io with restricted projects. Guest access in PM tools costs less and gets messy as the roster grows.
What is the cheapest viable stack? For a five-person team: Slack Pro around $36 a month, ClickUp Unlimited around $35, Notion Free, and Maeve Social Standard at $99 with 5 members lands near $170 for chat, PM, docs, and social, with Figma's and Miro's free tiers covering design and whiteboards.
How do I get my team to adopt these tools? One at a time. Start with the layer you need most, get it adopted, then add the next tool a month or two later. Teams that roll out four tools at once end up using none of them properly.

Build by slot: chat, PM, docs, whiteboards, design, proofing, social. Every tool here is the honest leader of its layer or close to it, and the failure mode is always the same, asking one of them to be all of them.

Most of these have free tiers or trials, so a candidate stack costs nothing to assemble. Run one real campaign through it before signing anything annual.